Contagem regressiva para outro “CASO IRAN-CONTRAS” ou Farsa iraquiana. É apenas uma questão de tempo, para o Iran ser massacrado pela coalizão entre USA, UK, Arábia Saudita e Israel. Em minha opinião, este teatro foi concebido através da seguinte lógica. Os yankees estadunidenses após um cerco econômico produzirão um ataque efetivo ao território do Iran ou adjacências, possivelmente como preparo a um golpe final contra o país, a fim de controlar as reservas de petróleos existentes. De fato, e no evento, o segundo pilar desta conspiração que se forma (Reino Unido), apoiaria todo o conflito de forma política, ideológica e na integração logística, etc. O terceiro membro referido acima (Arábia Saudita) apoiaria economicamente o evento, através dos petrodólares, ou mesmo através do óleo, somente aumentando a remessa aos EUA sem notificação a OPEP; e por último, como era esperado, entraria com o “selo” de Deus, de que a ação é parte do “Destino Manifesto”, que antes lhe pertencia – Judá/Israel – e que, foi passado por vontade de Deus, aos estadunidenses. E assim, com a benção de Israel, e o descrédito da ONU a ação estaria consolidada e consumada. Os estadunidenses, na liderança daquele triunvirato, esperam “matar dois coelhos com uma só cajadada”. Estender a “primavera árabe” [à moda deles] ao Iran, e com isso quebrar a espinha dorsal da relação perigosa [para Israel e Arábia Saudita] que está se formando entre: o Iran, a Turquia, o Egito e os demais países do Oriente Médio libertos das ditaduras apoiadas e financiadas pelos EUA e seus parceiros; e, além disso, reeleger Barack Obama. Complementado, em minha opinião eles só se esqueceram de combinar com os dois maiores “parceiros” do Iran. Ou seja, Rússia e China, respectivamente, o maior vendedor de armamentos e o maior comprador de petróleo e gás. Uma curiosidade, em dois tempos: todos os envolvido aqui, têm grandes e grossos ... [heheh] ... mísseis, e por mais que nos digam que somos pacifistas, e que por “não” termos armamentos nucleares, devemos ficar tranquilos pois em um conflito deste porte não seremos atacados; eu recomendo que todos busquem entender o que são e quais as finalidades dos chamados “jogos de guerra”; o que é “Weapons Mass Destruction (WMD) e o que é Defense Condition, especialmente o nível “DEFCON 1”; em todas as simulações que se tem acesso, sempre sobram três bombinhas de 100 mt para nós. Um doce a quem intuir onde caem cada uma delas.
====== xxxx =====
RESUME IN ENGLISH
Countdown for beging or to the end?
Countdown for another [Iran]Gate or Iran[aq] farce. Just matter of time, Iran could’ve been slaughtered by coalition between USA, UK, Saudi Arabia and Israel. In my opinion, it’s been conceived [“the fake”] through this logic. American Yankees after an economic besiege, will produce an effective attack on physical territory, perhaps for finally strike that country an’ to get Iran’s oil reserves. Indeed, the second one may support whole conflict with political, ideological, integrated logistics support (ISL), anyway. The third member I refer above must pay his part in “cash petrol”, this one will be responsible for economical support, and finally the last one as all of us expecting, will be responsible for “blessing” all of them with its god of war, which it isn’t our God of Peace and grace. However, none of them will put themselves to the hazard, because Organization of United Nations (UN) has no credibility, honour, reliability, integrity or any other word you may use for describing this situation.
All about this topic can be found at.
"U.S. official: 'Multiple' sources strengthen case against Iran".
By the CNN Wire Staff - updated 2:16 AM EST, Fri October 14, 2011
Sourced on: http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/13/world/meast/iran-saudi-plot/index.html
sexta-feira, 14 de outubro de 2011
sexta-feira, 6 de maio de 2011
What 'Situation Room Photo' reveals about us
(CNN) -- By now, the photo is a classic. It's become the most viewed image on Flickr -- a mesmerizing picture that suggests as much as it reveals. You may know it simply as the "Situation Room Photo," but you may not be aware of what some say are three subliminal messages that make it so powerful and unusual. ![]() Most commentators have focused on the historic nature of the photo: Obama staring at the screen with a grim intensity; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, covering her mouth to repress her reaction -- the epicenter of U.S. military power hunting down its most hated foe. But look deeper and that photo becomes historic in a more subtle way. It's a snapshot of how much this nation's attitudes about race, women and presidential swagger are changing, [...] "The photo is visually suggestive of a new American landscape that we're still crossing into," says Saladin Ambar, a political science professor at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. "When Obama was elected, there were some people who thought that we had crossed a racial threshold," Ambar says. "What his presidency is revealing is that there are many crossings." A black man becomes 'protector in chief' The photo crosses one threshold of race in its unusual framing of an African-American man threatening violence, one black commentator says. For much of U.S. history, the black man has often been portrayed as the threat to America's safety -- the angry man, the thug, the one you cross the street to avoid, says Cheryl Contee, co-founder of Jack & Jill Politics, a blog focused on current affairs from a black perspective […] the black man is [appear as a] America's protector. There's no historical precedent for this image, she says. White Americans now see a black man not just as their president but their "protector in chief," Contee says […] "That photo is amazing," she says. "It's another step toward rehabilitation of the image of black men in American culture. It's going to forever impact how people see black men in America." The photo also resolves a tricky image problem for Obama, says Jerald Podair, a history professor at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin. Podair says Obama has always been careful to avoid the angry black male stereotype in his public persona, but has acquired another image -- that of detachment, even weakness. The photo of Obama hunkered down with his national security team watching the stalking and killing of bin Laden solves both problems, Podair says. "He can now appear strong without being threatening. After all, he's on our side. Obama can now take up his white predecessors' mantle of 'protector in chief,' " Podair says. It's not certain how long that mantle will stay attached to Obama, but at least one political scientist says he's already seen the photo's impact. "This is one of the rare times that Tea Party supporters have referred to Obama as President Obama," says Ari Kohen, an associate professor of social justice and political science at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Women at the center of power The photo also breaks ground when it comes to women, others say. The image is laced with testosterone: a crowded room full of powerful military and political men, some with medals bristling across their uniforms, gathered to drop America's hammer. Some online viewers compared it to the photos of D-Day during World War II. Another said it was a portrait of "the nexus of power in the Western world." But there were no iconic shots of women storming the beaches of Normandy or raising the flag at Iwo Jima. Go back and examine the defining historic photos of American military might in action, and women are absent, historians say. A glance at the now famous photos of President John F. Kennedy and his staff during the Cuban missile crisis is typical, says Ambar, the Lehigh University professor. The photos show square-jawed men in crew cuts and uniforms surrounding Kennedy in the White House. You can practically smell the Aqua Velva in those old black-and-white photos. "But if you go back and look at the Cuban missile crisis photos and the movies about it, there's no women," Ambar says. "In the movie 'Thirteen Days,' the only woman in the film was Kennedy's secretary." Yet you see two powerful women in the Situation Room photograph -- Clinton and Audrey Tomason, director for counterterrorism, who is straining to see from the back. Their inclusion shows how far women have come, Ambar says, even though Clinton's response is ambiguous because she's covering her mouth in what looks to be alarm. [...] "God only knows what she's seeing on the screen," Ambar says. (Clinton has since said she was trying not to cough.) [...] Lori Brown, a sociologist, says showing two women at the center of American military power is noteworthy, but Clinton's gesture undermines some of its impact. "Women are often more physical in their emotional responses and in a 'power situation' it may not seem as acceptable, but times are changing and the Situation Room needs to change, too," says Brown, a professor of sociology at Meredith College in Raleigh, North Carolina. "Her emotions were more obvious, but I am sure many of the men in the room felt the same way she did." Obama gets a little swagger The photo finally crosses the threshold of what may be called presidential swagger, historians say. American presidents have traditionally sold themselves as our alpha male. Theodore Roosevelt went safari hunting; Ronald Reagan cleared brush at his ranch in a cowboy hat; George W. Bush did his "Top Gun" imitation when he donned a flight suit on the deck of an aircraft carrier. […] "There's a certain kind of machismo and swagger that Americans expect their president to reflect," says Clarence Lusane, author of "The Black History of the White House." […] Projecting that presidential swagger was so powerful that it obscured some presidents' serious illnesses, such as President Franklin Roosevelt's polio and Kennedy's hobbling assortment of ailments, including a bad back, Lusane says. […] "They were both very ill. Kennedy could barely stand for two hours. But they never let those images out because they had to project toughness. Obama, though, is a different animal." […] The photo shows why. […] If someone didn't know who Obama was, he or she probably couldn't tell that he was the president in the room, some scholars say. […] "He's not in the tallest chair," says Brown, the sociology professor at Meredith College. "He's not the center of attention. He's not even in the middle of the room." […] Yet Obama's willingness to be photographed without the typical Oval Office swagger gives birth to a new type of swagger, says Contee of Jack & Jill Politics. […] As Obama moves into the third year of his term, photos will capture moments that show how far we've come. […] "That's part of what being the first African-American president is all about -- we're all being transformed together," he says. […] Ambar says he was so intrigued by the Situation Room photo that he cut it out to study it. He's still parsing its meaning. "It is an image unimaginable 30 years ago," he says. "Let us hope we have more of these in the nation's future." Links referenced within this article Jack & Jill Politics http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/ (Clinton has since said she was trying not to cough.) http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/05/iconic-photo-might-not-be-all-it-seems-says-clinton/ Find this article at: http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/05/05/iconic.photo/index.html [Grifos e sublinhados nossos] [All mark an' underline may give for us] ================ Artigo interessante, retirado do sitio da CNN, que fala sobre as três mudanças que demonstra a foto em questão; uma mudança na imagem dos afro-estadunidenses; que, de grupo tratado histórica e culturalmente como ameaças, ou "aquele que você cruza a rua para evitar", tornam-se mais e mais "confiáveis". Isso porque, O homem negro em questão - Obama - passa de Chefe à Protetor; ou "Protector in Chief". A segunda mudança é a nova posição da figura da mulher no centro do poder decisório; passando de mera figura decorativa, da secretária de JF Kennedy, a Secretária de Estado com Hillary Clinton, [apesar do desespero emocional dela, ao assistir em tempo real, parte da cabeça de Bin Laden, ser expodida pelos projeteis Cal. 5,56 mm das forças especiais dos EUA; e por último, há uma mudança na "arrogância" da figura "presidencial"; que abandonando a figura autoproclamada de "safari man" de Theodore Roosevelt, ou a de rancheiro machão de Ronald Reagan, e mesmo a de falso "Top Gun" de George W. Bush; apresenta um cara simples, em "mangas de camisa" ou seja, sem aqueles ternos caros e sofisticados; que "não está sentado no centro da sala", mas que demonstra total controle da situação, apesar de ser "negro", para azar dos racista de plantão. Uma competencia, equilibrio e determinação que enche de esperança analistas e pesquisadores e a própria nação estadunidense, como fica claro nas palavras finais da matéria. Em minha opinião, ainda há muitas barreiras a serem superadas com relação ao tratamento dispensado pelos EUA, ao restante do mundo, principalmente, as nações periféricas do terceiro mundo e do "under world". Mundo este que jaz em profundo estado de cisão civilizacional, como bem lembra S. P. Huntington em seu livro: "The Clash of civilizations and the Remaking of World Order", sendo malhado ora pela ação do "Soft Power" [violência simbólica ou social, cultural, etc. - Devemos pensar a ação contra o Bin Laden como ação moderada do "Hard Power" e não o contrário]; ora pela ação do "Hard Power" [vide ataques ao Iraque, Afeganistão e recentemente, a Líbia]. Mas, realmente tais mudanças, observadas na fotografia liberada intencionalmente pelo governo dos EUA, ainda que não muito profundas, [por enquanto, visto que não se pode para ou controlar os embates de forças contra-hegemônicas dentro do "bloco histórico" como nos deixa transparecer os estudos gramsciano], no espectro do poder estadunidense, pelo menos não deixa nossa esperança morrrer de tédio. OBS. A reportagem em questão está referenciada através do link em anexo, e é propriedade intelectual da rede CNN; qualquer referência deve ser feita a CNN, e os créditos, se houverem, devem ser dados a mesma. Por fim, devemos dizer que a reportagem, não foi reproduzida na íntegra. OBS. At about "breaking news" quoting, all rights reserved to CNN Network; 1) Nota: Finalmente, pedimos desculpas se cometemos algum erro de digitação ou não, devido a nossa pressa. 1) Note: We apologize, if I make some mistake, 'cause we in a hurry ..., ever. |
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)